1 Tushakar

The Devil Wears Prada Book And Movie Comparison Essays


2910 WordsApr 17th, 201512 Pages

Urban History –

To what extent how do the urbanism theories applied on movie, “The Devil Wears Prada” in terms of creating the XXXXX


When we hear the name of the movie, "The Devil Wears Prada", it may triggers you to imagine about the glory of the fashion industry. The story takes place in an urban city, New York where the heterogeneity and the trend of fashion is always created. The main characters in this movie, Andrea Sachs is a journalist who had just graduated from university and started working as the second assistant of the authoritative CEO of “Runway Fashion Magazine”, Miranda Priestly. The story mainly happens in between the two protagonists in the company with the theme of consumerism in the…show more content…

Runway, the name of the fashion magazine company she works with, has transformed Andrea's identity through out the story. This can be seen in the scene when Andrea asks Nigel, who is the Miranda’s fashion assistant to change her image after Miranda criticized on her look. After Nigel transform her, this change impact on her career and self-esteem. Since she changes the way she dresses, her personality is also changed. This had a strong influence to improve the relationships with her manager, Miranda. She is the representation of the capitalism’s ideal beauty myth, accepted the transformation of the protagonist. Another evidence showing that fashion gives a change on protagonist's identity and personality is the saying of protagonist’s boyfriend, Nate. He prefers the way the main protagonist had been before the transformation. Since the accentuation of the protagonist’s apparel was shifted in the new community is changed, she become the ‘Runway girl’. From the aforementioned ideas above, it is well described that the film illustrates us the enormous influence on fashion to change ones identity.
This idea can be connected to the theory mentioned by Georg Simmel. Under his theory, he referred to the flash speed of changes in fashion industry (Simmel p.187). “Fashion is a form of imitation and so of social equalization, but, paradoxically, in changing incessantly, it differentiates one time from another and one social stratum from another. It

Show More

(This was written for our next issue of Femnista, but at the last minute I found a topic I’m more passionate about.)

Most movies are not better than the books on which they are based.

I thought this was the truth until I read The Devil Wears Prada. I almost didn’t see it, since it looked “boring.” But I had nothing else to do the day of its release so I went loved every minute of it. The film was funny, quirky, and had real heart. So, under the assumption “the book is always better,” I read it and to my disappointment, most of the story wasn’t the same. The book didn’t really have an over-reaching plot arc other than me wondering how much more Andy was going to put up with before she called it quits. Where the film’s characters manage to be likable in spite of their behavior, in the book it’s hard to like any of them, since they range from rude to full-blown elitist snob.

Though I am much more a fan of period pieces, Prada is my favorite “modern” film due to its characters. These women dominate the plot and leave us something to think about at the end. None are perfect, all are flawed, some are just plain mean, but their individual journeys make the story impacting.

Our leading lady is Andy, a wannabe writer who gets stuck working for Runway, a fashion magazine. The better she is at her job (after she gives up being frumpy and puts some effort into it), the worse her personal life gets. She starts missing out on important things, like her boyfriend’s birthday. As she inches closer to success, she becomes more like her boss, a woman she hates. Andy goes from a fun-loving girl in a committed relationship to a girl who pulls a one-night stand with a guy in Paris and stabs a colleague in the back to save her job. Fortunately, Andy comes around when Miranda tells her she sees a lot of herself in Andy. Instead of being flattered, she quits, walks away and never looks back.

Andy starts out as one person, becomes someone else, and ends up a blend of the two. For awhile she puts her personal ambition ahead of her many relationships. The moment she decides to get the Harry Potter book for Miranda she starts down a dark path. For awhile, she tries to deny responsibility but in the end comes to see that no one forced her to do anything; she chose to stay. It’s just that what she really wanted (to be successful at her job) is what Miranda asked for from her, so she could pretend it wasn’t her fault. Her job brings out the worst and the best in her; the best in her dedication and focus, the worst in her ambition. Only after seeing the injury Miranda does to Nigel does Andy decide to quit, and at last earns the respect of her tyrannical boss. Miranda was used to sycophants betraying one another at her whim to get ahead. Andy is the only one to say no.

The character of Miranda Priestly, the editor of Runway who refuses to share elevators with others and dismisses everyone with a cold “That’s all,” is loosely based on Vogue editor Anna Wintour (whose nickname in fashion circles is “Nuclear Wintour”). In the book, she is a controlling, emotionally abusive, irredeemable figure but the film gives her depth. Ever ready with an insult, Miranda struggles to hang onto a job a younger editor could do less expensively, in a fashion world that would turn on her in an instant, while married to a man who resents her success. Her success as an editor forces her to sacrifice her home life and leads her to a divorce. Her life looks glamorous but is full of emptiness. She is the emblem of what Nigel says is success: when your personal life falls apart. Her selfish behavior is tolerated because she is powerful enough to get away with it, but it also makes no one loyal to her. She is, truly, utterly alone in the world.

Themes that make me think are essential to my enjoyment of any project. The Devil Wears Prada is on the surface a critique of the falsities of fashion and exterior beauty. Though it may look glamorous on the outside, it is teeming with sarcasm, overblown egos, outrageous actions, models starving to be beautiful (as Emily says, “I’m only one stomach flu away from my goal weight!”), workplace backstabbing, and casual sex. It warns that ambition can lead to downfall if you place it ahead of others’ feelings. But the true worth of the story is that its devil is deceptive. Miranda is not cunning about anything; she asks for what she wants, and expects Andy to either get it for her, or to get out.

Christian, on the other hand, is a different story. He is not important in the book but on screen becomes an influencing force in Andy’s life. He is a famous writer, and someone Andy admires. He offers to critique her writing not out of kindness but interest. He intends to get her into bed and does not bother hiding it. In the end, he succeeds, but it takes him awhile of working at her moral conscience. His gift of the manuscript allows her to keep her job but ruins her relationship with her boyfriend in the process. He flirts with her, planting a wedge between her and her best friend. He wines and dines her and gets what he wants because Andy has changed enough from the girl she originally was to give it to him.

What is it they say about the devil? He’s not a dragon breathing fire in the front yard but is coming in the back in a nice suit and a sweet smile. Satan doesn’t confront us with evil, he offers us a small taste of it and lets our rebellious, selfish nature do the rest. Our choices damn us.

Maybe the devil in Prada isn’t Miranda after all. ♥

Like this:



Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *