1 Kilabar

Irac Sample Essay Writing

THE IRAC METHOD

          At some point in your law school career, you will be introduced to the I.R.A.C method. This acronym stands for: Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion. Although the definitions are useful as a foundation for legal writing, don't get stuck thinking (as many people do) that you have to keep these components in this specific order or that you can't style their arrangement to your needs; I kept my writing style open, and had great success in my writing assignments doing so. But, be warned, some professors will tell you exactly how you should order your paper, and you should follow their suggestions since they will be grading your writing. Here are the definitions of the components:

 

ISSUE:

          In legal writing, issues are the core of your paper or essay. If you can't spot a single issue, you will earn no points. To find issues, look for anything in the facts of a case that could raise a question, sometimes called a "question of law": Could the defendant be charged with x crime? Could he be convicted of that crime? Does he have any defenses for his actions? Is the case eligible to be heard by a jury? If a jury hears the case, would they convict even if the laws make the defendant look guilty?

          Issue spotting is easiest when you know the laws and court holdings of your state, so be sure to research and study thoroughly, but if you run across a question that is not addressed by the rules of your state, don't fret, this is a good opportunity to bring up rules from other jurisdictions that might persuade the court to make new precedence on that issue.

RULE:

          In legal writing, rules are the same as they are in the rest of life; they are statements that cannot be ignored without punishment, lower grades in our case. Rules can be found in laws, regulations, and precedents (court holdings from similar cases), but while all rules are mentionable, all do not carry the same strength. If one rule pertains to identical issues as your paper, and another has only similar issues, the most persuasive rule (which must be mentioned) is the one that is on point; it is up to you to decide whether the less persuasive rule is worth mentioning. The same differences in persuasiveness exist for rules that come from your states laws & courts versus those from other states. And of course, any ruling from the Supreme Court overrides local precedence on that issue.

 

APPLICATION:

          The application should be the simplest part of your writing. If you know the facts, can see the issues, and know the rules pertaining to those issues, the application will write itself. Simply state the issue, state the facts & rules that give rise to the issue, and tell your professor how those facts do or do not meet the requirements laid down by the rules. Then tell your professor whether you think a court would find the D guilty or not guilty based on the strength of the facts and the rules. Even though this seems simple, you must be vigilant to not leave any loose threads; address all elements of the rule and all the relevant facts. Don't try to strengthen your argument by "forgetting" to include elements or facts that hurt your argument.

 

CONCLUSION:

          The conclusion, as with all writing, is a statement that tells your reader what the result of your arguments is, or what it should be. But, as with all good writing, the conclusion should be redundant. All of your application sections should have already clearly stated the conclusion for each individual issue. I suggest using this final conclusion section only to remind the reader of those previous conclusions, and to resolve any differences between those conclusions, such as when a defendant can be found guilty of a crime, but also may have a defense. Example: "The Defendant met all of the elements of crime X, and can thus be found guilty, but it is likely the court will find that his justifiable defense of Y will prevent that conviction if they follow the precedent set by X v. Y.

 

The I.R.A.C. method is a great start, but there is much more to think about when writing an essay answer and when implementing the I.R.A.C. method, as found in Intro to Essay Writing.

 

The following is a guide to help you use the IRAC method to sort through a hypothetical legal problem.

IRAC Example 1                                                    IRAC Example 2

Facts

Even if you are not required to submit a list of facts in your answer, it is a good idea to write one.  This will help you sort through the facts you have been given and determine which facts are relevant and how you are going to use them. The following is a list of questions that may help you do this

  • Who is involved? (identify parties specifically by name, if possible)
  • Who suffered?
  • How?
  • Why? (was is avoidable?)
  • What is the known (relevant) information?
  • Is there any missing information?
  • Include specific details like dates and monetary figures
Note: Reread the question at the end of the case study. This will tell you what you are supposed to be doing and it will help you determine which facts are relevant.

 

Issues

  • Identify the problem: what has gone wrong and for whom?
  • Name each Plaintiff and Defendant and briefly describe their individual issues
  • Work out what area of law may govern the resolution of the problem.
  • This could include, but is not limited to the following bodies of law
    • Contract law (be specific about which part)
    • Trade practices (e.g. misleading conduct)
    • A company law issue (e.g. breach of director’s duty)
    • Negligence Criminal Law
    • Constitutional Law
    • Partnership Law
  • Assignments generally relate to one area of law but the assignment will usually raise a number of issues within that general area.
  • Identify any conflicting or troublesome facts
  • Note: Assessment tasks are set around the work that you have done in class or will do in class. You are not expected to go outside the content of the unit but you are expected to explore it

Rules and relevant Law

  • Set out the legal principles that will be used to address the problem.
  • Source legal principles from cases and legislation.

Note: Make sure you are specific when stating the relevant law/rules that apply, and always make sure to support propositions with case authority.

 

Application

  • Explain in detail why the Plaintiff’s claims are (or are not) justified, based on the body of law pertaining to the case.
  • How will this law be used by each party to argue their case?
  • Use relevant precedent cases or Legal Principles to support each answer.
  • You may also choose to use Legislation, when applicable.
  • There are often several Plaintiffs involved. Take the time to examine each case individually and analyse why their claims are (or are not) valid.
  • Legal Principals and precedent cases are used in each analysis, even if there is overlap among Plaintiffs (the same precedent can be applied to both parties, if appropriate. See example 2).
  • It is acceptable to refer the reader to another point in the paper, rather than rewriting it word for word, if the situation calls for the same legal recommendation. (See example 1 and 2)

Note: Take time to discuss the contentious aspects of the case rather than the ones that are most comfortable or obvious.

 

Conclusion

  • Stand back and play ‘the judge.’
  • Choose the argument you think is the strongest and articulate what you believe to be the appropriate answer.
  • State who is liable for what and to what extent.
  • Consider how parties could have acted to better manage their risks in order to avoid this legal problem.
 

Back to top

 

Leave a Comment

(0 Comments)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *