1 Shaktilrajas

What Is Wikipedias Bibliography

This page is a Bibliography of scientific publications and sources about wikis in general and Wikipedia in particular. Feel free to add and modify publications, if the publication is

  • scholarly or scientifically relevant (no journalistic articles)
  • dedicated to Wikis or Wikipedia (no articles that only mention Wikis)
  • cited correctly (at least with author, title, date and formatted uniformly)
  • sorted and noted meaningfully (think about where to put it and add a description or put it into the "unsorted"-section)

See also: Research for what's currently going on, #Folksonomic bibliographies for more bibliographies

Scientific publications[edit]

sorted by year and then by surname

2018[edit]

  • F. Brigo, S. Lattanzi, G. Giussani, L. Tassi, N. Pietrafusa, C. A. Galimberti, R. Nardone, N. L. Bragazzi, O. Mecarelli: Italian Wikipedia and epilepsy: An infodemiological study of online information-seeking behavior. In: Epilepsy & behavior : E&B. [elektronische Veröffentlichung vor dem Druck] Februar 2018, DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.01.037, PMID 29454607.
  • F. Brigo, S. Lattanzi, N. Bragazzi, R. Nardone, M. Moccia, L. Lavorgna: Why do people search Wikipedia for information on multiple sclerosis? In: Multiple sclerosis and related disorders. [elektronische Veröffentlichung vor dem Druck] Februar 2018, DOI:10.1016/j.msard.2018.02.001, PMID 29428464.
  • J. Lerner, A. Lomi: Knowledge categorization affects popularity and quality of Wikipedia articles. In: PloS one. Band 13, Nummer 1, 2018, S. e0190674, DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0190674, PMID 29293627.
  • N. Mahroum, N. L. Bragazzi, K. Sharif, V. Gianfredi, D. Nucci, R. Rosselli, F. Brigo, M. Adawi, H. Amital, A. Watad: Leveraging Google Trends, Twitter, and Wikipedia to Investigate the Impact of a Celebrity's Death From Rheumatoid Arthritis. In: Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases. [elektronische Veröffentlichung vor dem Druck] Februar 2018, DOI:10.1097/RHU.0000000000000692, PMID 29461342.
  • O. Modiri, D. Guha, N. M. Alotaibi, G. M. Ibrahim, N. Lipsman, A. Fallah: Readability and quality of wikipedia pages on neurosurgical topics. In: Clinical neurology and neurosurgery. Band 166, März 2018, S. 66–70, DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.021, PMID 29408776.

2017[edit]

  • K. Ban, M. Perc, Z. Levnajić: Robust clustering of languages across Wikipedia growth. In: Royal Society open science. Band 4, Nummer 10, Oktober 2017, S. 171217, DOI:10.1098/rsos.171217, PMID 29134106.
  • J. Jirschitzka, J. Kimmerle, I. Halatchliyski, J. Hancke, D. Meurers, U. Cress: A productive clash of perspectives? The interplay between articles' and authors' perspectives and their impact on Wikipedia edits in a controversial domain. In: PloS one. Band 12, Nummer 6, 2017, S. e0178985, DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0178985, PMID 28575077.
  • D. Lamprecht, K. Lerman, D. Helic, M. Strohmaier: How the structure of Wikipedia articles influences user navigation. In: The new review of hypermedia and multimedia. Band 23, Nummer 1, Januar 2017, S. 29–50, DOI:10.1080/13614568.2016.1179798, PMID 28670171.
  • T. S. Ledger: Introduction to anatomy on Wikipedia. In: Journal of anatomy. Band 231, Nummer 3, September 2017, S. 430–432, DOI:10.1111/joa.12640, PMID 28703298.
  • L. A. Maggio, J. M. Willinsky, R. M. Steinberg, D. Mietchen, J. L. Wass, T. Dong: Wikipedia as a gateway to biomedical research: The relative distribution and use of citations in the English Wikipedia. In: PloS one. Band 12, Nummer 12, 2017, S. e0190046, DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0190046, PMID 29267345.
  • M. A. Mouriño-García, R. Pérez-Rodríguez, L. E. Anido-Rifón: A Bag of Concepts Approach for Biomedical Document Classification Using Wikipedia Knowledge*. Spanish-English Cross-language Case Study. In: Methods of information in medicine. Band 56, Nummer 5, Oktober 2017, S. 370–376, DOI:10.3414/ME17-01-0028, PMID 28816337.
  • A. Oeberst, I. von der Beck, M. D Back, U. Cress, S. Nestler: Biases in the production and reception of collective knowledge: the case of hindsight bias in Wikipedia. In: Psychological research. [elektronische Veröffentlichung vor dem Druck] April 2017, DOI:10.1007/s00426-017-0865-7, PMID 28417198.
  • R. Priedhorsky, D. Osthus, A. R. Daughton, K. R. Moran, N. Generous, G. Fairchild, A. Deshpande, S. Y. Del Valle: Measuring Global Disease with Wikipedia: Success, Failure, and a Research Agenda. In: CSCW : proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Band 2017, 2017 Feb-Mar, S. 1812–1834, DOI:10.1145/2998181.2998183, PMID 28782059.
  • M. A. Scaffidi, R. Khan, C. Wang, D. Keren, C. Tsui, A. Garg, S. Brar, K. Valoo, M. Bonert, J. F. de Wolff, J. Heilman, S. C. Grover: Comparison of the Impact of Wikipedia, UpToDate, and a Digital Textbook on Short-Term Knowledge Acquisition Among Medical Students: Randomized Controlled Trial of Three Web-Based Resources. In: JMIR medical education. Band 3, Nummer 2, Oktober 2017, S. e20, DOI:10.2196/mededu.8188, PMID 29089291
  • L. Schmidt, J. Friedel, C. E. Adams: SEED: a tool for disseminating systematic review data into Wikipedia. In: Systematic reviews. Band 6, Nummer 1, Oktober 2017, S. 206, DOI:10.1186/s13643-017-0607-3, PMID 29041959.
  • S. Sciascia, M. Radin: What can Google and Wikipedia can tell us about a disease? Big Data trends analysis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. In: International journal of medical informatics. Band 107, November 2017, S. 65–69, DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.09.002, PMID 29029693.
  • T. Shafee, D. Mietchen, A. I. Su: Academics can help shape Wikipedia. In: Science. Band 357, Nummer 6351, August 2017, S. 557–558, DOI:10.1126/science.aao0462, PMID 28798122.
  • M. Tsvetkova, R. García-Gavilanes, L. Floridi, T. Yasseri: Even good bots fight: The case of Wikipedia. In: PloS one. Band 12, Nummer 2, 2017, S. e0171774, DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0171774, PMID 28231323
  • A. Watad, N. L. Bragazzi, F. Brigo, K. Sharif, H. Amital, D. McGonagle, Y. Shoenfeld, M. Adawi: Readability of Wikipedia Pages on Autoimmune Disorders: Systematic Quantitative Assessment. In: Journal of medical Internet research. Band 19, Nummer 7, Juli 2017, S. e260, DOI:10.2196/jmir.8225, PMID 28720555.
  • J. Xia, Y. Hou, Y. V. Chen, Z. C. Qian, D. S. Ebert, W. Chen: Visualizing Rank Time Series of Wikipedia Top-Viewed Pages. In: IEEE computer graphics and applications. Band 37, Nummer 2, 2017 Mar-Apr, S. 42–53, DOI:10.1109/MCG.2017.21, PMID 28320644.
  • S. Yenikent, P. Holtz, J. Kimmerle: The Impact of Topic Characteristics and Threat on Willingness to Engage with Wikipedia Articles: Insights from Laboratory Experiments. In: Frontiers in psychology. Band 8, 2017, S. 1960, DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01960, PMID 29163323.

2016[edit]

  • Eva Gredel: Digitale Diskursanalysen: Kollaborative Konstruktion von Wissensbeständen am Beispiel der Wikipedia. In: Sylvia Jaki, Annette Sabban (Hrsg.), Wissensformate in den Medien. Berlin, Frank & Timme, S. 317-339.
  • A. M. Kilpatrick: The 5th ISCB Wikipedia Competition: Coming to a Classroom Near You? In: PLoS computational biology. Band 12, Nummer 12, Dezember 2016, S. e1005235, DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005235, PMID 28033360.
  • S. Kim, S. Park, S. A. Hale, S. Kim, J. Byun, A. H. Oh: Understanding Editing Behaviors in Multilingual Wikipedia. In: PloS one. Band 11, Nummer 5, 2016, S. e0155305, DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0155305, PMID 27171158.
  • Arne Köhn, Florian Stegen and Timo Baumann (2016) "Mining the Spoken Wikipedia for Speech Data and Beyond" in _Proceedings of LREC_, Portoroz, Slovenia. URN: urn:nbn:de:gbv:18-228-7-2209.
  • D. M. Lowe, N. M. O'Boyle, R. A. Sayle: Efficient chemical-disease identification and relationship extraction using Wikipedia to improve recall. In: Database : the journal of biological databases and curation. Band 2016, 2016, S. , DOI:10.1093/database/baw039, PMID 27060160.
  • G. Masukume, L. Kipersztok, D. Das, T. M. Shafee, M. R. Laurent, J. M. Heilman: Medical journals and Wikipedia: a global health matter. In: The Lancet. Global health. Band 4, Nummer 11, November 2016, S. e791, DOI:10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30254-6, PMID 27765289.
  • E. Park, T. Masupe, J. Joseph, A. Ho-Foster, A. Chavez, S. Jammalamadugu, A. Marek, R. Arumala, D. Ketshogileng, R. Littman-Quinn, C. Kovarik: Information needs of Botswana health care workers and perceptions of wikipedia. In: International journal of medical informatics. Band 95, 11 2016, S. 8–16, DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.07.013, PMID 27697235.
  • M. K. Sharma: Wikipedia use: Risk for developing technology addiction. In: Industrial psychiatry journal. Band 25, Nummer 1, 2016 Jan-Jun, S. 107–109, DOI:10.4103/0972-6748.196054, PMID 28163416.
  • J. D. Sharpe, R. S. Hopkins, R. L. Cook, C. W. Striley: Evaluating Google, Twitter, and Wikipedia as Tools for Influenza Surveillance Using Bayesian Change Point Analysis: A Comparative Analysis. In: JMIR public health and surveillance. Band 2, Nummer 2, Oktober 2016, S. e161, DOI:10.2196/publichealth.5901, PMID 27765731.
  • Tramullas, Jesús, Piedad Garrido-Picazo y Ana I. Sánchez-Casabón (2016) "Research on Wikipedia Vandalism: a brief literature review." In: 4th Spanish Conference on Information Retrieval CERI 2016, Granada. ACM, 2016. DOI: 10.1145/2934732.2934748,
  • E. Wulczyn, R. West, L. Zia, J. Leskovec: Growing Wikipedia Across Languages via Recommendation. In: Proceedings of the.. International World-Wide Web Conference. International WWW Conference. Band 2016, April 2016, S. 975–985, PMID 27819073.
  • A. Yıldırım, S. Üsküdarlı, A. Özgür: Identifying Topics in Microblogs Using Wikipedia. In: PloS one. Band 11, Nummer 3, 2016, S. e0151885, DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0151885, PMID 26991442.
  • J. Yun, S. H. Lee, H. Jeong: Intellectual interchanges in the history of the massive online open-editing encyclopedia, Wikipedia. In: Physical review. E. Band 93, Nummer 1, Januar 2016, S. 012307, DOI:10.1103/PhysRevE.93.012307, PMID 26871092.
  • Y. Zhang, Y. H. Lin: Writing a Wikipedia Article on Cultural Competence in Health Care. In: Medical reference services quarterly. Band 35, Nummer 2, 2016, S. 175–186, DOI:10.1080/02763869.2016.1152143, PMID 27054534.

2015[edit]

  • S. A. Azer, N. M. AlSwaidan, L. A. Alshwairikh, J. M. AlShammari: Accuracy and readability of cardiovascular entries on Wikipedia: are they reliable learning resources for medical students? In: BMJ open. Band 5, Nummer 10, Oktober 2015, S. e008187, DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008187, PMID 26443650.
  • S. A. Azer: Is Wikipedia a reliable learning resource for medical students? Evaluating respiratory topics. In: Advances in physiology education. Band 39, Nummer 1, März 2015, S. 5–14, DOI:10.1152/advan.00110.2014, PMID 25727464.
  • F. Brigo, R. Erro: The readability of the English Wikipedia article on Parkinson's disease. In: Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology. Band 36, Nummer 6, Juni 2015, S. 1045–1046, DOI:10.1007/s10072-015-2077-5, PMID 25596713.
  • F. Brigo, W. M. Otte, S. C. Igwe, H. Ausserer, R. Nardone, F. Tezzon, E. Trinka: Information-seeking behaviour for epilepsy: an infodemiological study of searches for Wikipedia articles. In: Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape. Band 17, Nummer 4, Dezember 2015, S. 460–466, DOI:10.1684/epd.2015.0772, PMID 26575365.
  • F. Brigo, S. C. Igwe, R. Nardone, P. Lochner, F. Tezzon, W. M. Otte: Wikipedia and neurological disorders. In: Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia. Band 22, Nummer 7, Juli 2015, S. 1170–1172, DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2015.02.006, PMID 25890773.
  • Borowiecki Karol J. and Navarrete Trilce (2015) "Change in Access after Digitization: Ethnographic Collections in Wikipedia" in ACEI working papers PDF
  • G. S. Chen, Y. Xiong: Wikipedia vs peer-reviewed medical literature for information about the 10 most costly medical conditions-III. In: The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. Band 114, Nummer 10, Oktober 2014, S. 764–765, DOI:10.7556/jaoa.2014.148, PMID 25288709.
  • Y. H. Eom, P. Aragón, D. Laniado, A. Kaltenbrunner, S. Vigna, D. L. Shepelyansky: Interactions of cultures and top people of Wikipedia from ranking of 24 language editions. In: PloS one. Band 10, Nummer 3, 2015, S. e0114825, DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0114825, PMID 25738291.
  • P. Ertl, L. Patiny, T. Sander, C. Rufener, M. Zasso: Wikipedia Chemical Structure Explorer: substructure and similarity searching of molecules from Wikipedia. In: Journal of cheminformatics. Band 7, 2015, S. 10, DOI:10.1186/s13321-015-0061-y, PMID 25815062.
  • G. Fairchild, S. Y. Del Valle, L. De Silva, A. M. Segre: Eliciting Disease Data from Wikipedia Articles. In: Proceedings of the.. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Band 2015, Mai 2015, S. 26–33, PMID 28721308.
  • E. Gabarron, A. Y. Lau, R. Wynn: Is There a Weekly Pattern for Health Searches on Wikipedia and Is the Pattern Unique to Health Topics? In: Journal of medical Internet research. Band 17, Nummer 12, Dezember 2015, S. e286, DOI:10.2196/jmir.5038, PMID 26693859.
  • Y. Gandica, J. Carvalho, F. Sampaio Dos Aidos: Wikipedia editing dynamics. In: Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics. Band 91, Nummer 1, Januar 2015, S. 012824, DOI:10.1103/PhysRevE.91.012824, PMID 25679673.
  • J. M. Heilman, A. G. West: Wikipedia and medicine: quantifying readership, editors, and the significance of natural language. In: Journal of medical Internet research. Band 17, Nummer 3, März 2015, S. e62, DOI:10.2196/jmir.4069, PMID 25739399.
  • V. G. Herbert, A. Frings, H. Rehatschek, G. Richard, A. Leithner: Wikipedia–challenges and new horizons in enhancing medical education. In: BMC medical education. Band 15, März 2015, S. 32, DOI:10.1186/s12909-015-0309-2, PMID 25879421.
  • K. S. Hickmann, G. Fairchild, R. Priedhorsky, N. Generous, J. M. Hyman, A. Deshpande, S. Y. Del Valle: Forecasting the 2013-2014 influenza season using Wikipedia. In: PLoS computational biology. Band 11, Nummer 5, Mai 2015, S. e1004239, DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004239, PMID 25974758.
  • Gabriele Hooffacker: Die Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Wikipedia vermitteln. Wissenskonstruktion und -dekonstruktion in der Hochschuldidaktik. In: medien + erziehung (1), 2015, S. 53–58 (Abstract).
  • M. Kämpf, E. Tessenow, D. Y. Kenett, J. W. Kantelhardt: The Detection of Emerging Trends Using Wikipedia Traffic Data and Context Networks. In: PloS one. Band 10, Nummer 12, 2015, S. e0141892, DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0141892, PMID 26720074.
  • Koltzenburg Claudia: Nicht-propositionales Wissen aus Literaturlektüre und Bedingungen seiner Darstellbarkeit in Wikipedia-Einträgen zu literarischen Werken (wikified version @Wikiversity), Open Access (PhD dissertation, Philosophische Fakultät, Tübingen University, Germany) (Abstract en)
  • L. Koppen, J. Phillips, R. Papageorgiou: Analysis of reference sources used in drug-related Wikipedia articles. In: Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA. Band 103, Nummer 3, Juli 2015, S. 140–144, DOI:10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.007, PMID 26213506.
  • D. Lamprecht, M. Strohmaier, D. Helic, C. Nyulas, T. Tudorache, N. F. Noy, M. A. Musen: Using ontologies to model human navigation behavior in information networks: A study based on Wikipedia. In: Semantic web. Band 6, Nummer 4, 2015, S. 403–422, DOI:10.3233/SW-140143, PMID 26568745.
  • J. Launer: Setting the facts straight on Wikipedia. In: Postgraduate medical journal. Band 91, Nummer 1077, Juli 2015, S. 413–414, DOI:10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133574, PMID 26082559.
  • Karlik Marcin (2015): "Wikipedia 2001-2015 - czternaście lat innowacji w obszarze wolnego dostępu do wiedzy." In: A. Kołodziej-Durnas (eds.), "Reklama społeczna - między społecznymi problemami a innowacjami". University of Szczecin; Szczecin, ISBN 978-83-64277-41-2, pp. 115–130.
  • M. A. Mouriño García, R. Pérez Rodríguez, L. E. Anido Rifón: Biomedical literature classification using encyclopedic knowledge: a Wikipedia-based bag-of-concepts approach. In: PeerJ. Band 3, 2015, S. e1279, DOI:10.7717/peerj.1279, PMID 26468436.
  • S. J. Park, J. W. Kim, H. J. Lee, H. Park, D. Han, P. Gloor: Exploration of Online Culture Through Network Analysis of Wikipedia. In: Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking. Band 18, Nummer 11, November 2015, S. 674–681, DOI:10.1089/cyber.2014.0638, PMID 26468763.
  • A. Pfundner, T. Schönberg, J. Horn, R. D. Boyce, M. Samwald: Utilizing the Wikidata system to improve the quality of medical content in Wikipedia in diverse languages: a pilot study. In: Journal of medical Internet research. Band 17, Nummer 5, Mai 2015, S. e110, DOI:10.2196/jmir.4163, PMID 25944105.
  • U. Rechenberg, C. Josten, S. Klima: [Is it possible to enhance our expert knowledge from Wikipedia?]. In: Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie. Band 153, Nummer 2, April 2015, S. 171–176, DOI:10.1055/s-0034-1396207, PMID 25874396.
  • Barbara Rösch: Wie interagieren Nutzer mit Text- und Bildinformationen in einem Wikipedia-Artikel? In: Information – Wissenschaft & Praxis, Band 66, Heft 1, Februar 2015, S. 17–21, DOI:10.1515/iwp-2015-0008.
  • D. R. Schlegel, C. Crowner, P. L. Elkin: Automatically Expanding the Synonym Set of SNOMED CT using Wikipedia. In: Studies in health technology and informatics. Band 216, 2015, S. 619–623, PMID 26262125.
  • Claudia Wagner, et al.: It's a Man's Wikipedia? Assessing Gender Inequality in an Online Encyclopedia. In: The International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM2015), Oxford, Mai 2015 (arXiv:1501.06307)
  • J. A. Vilensky, J. Steenberg: Anatomy and Wikipedia. In: Clinical anatomy. Band 28, Nummer 5, Juli 2015, S. 565–567, DOI:10.1002/ca.22562, PMID 25974249.
  • R. West, A. Paranjape, J. Leskovec: Mining Missing Hyperlinks from Human Navigation Traces: A Case Study of Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the.. International World-Wide Web Conference. International WWW Conference. Band 2015, 2015, S. 1242–1252, PMID 26634229.
  • A. M. Wilson, G. E. Likens: Content Volatility of Scientific Topics in Wikipedia: A Cautionary Tale. In: PloS one. Band 10, Nummer 8, 2015, S. e0134454, DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0134454, PMID 26275058.

2014[edit]

  • S. A. Azer: Evaluation of gastroenterology and hepatology articles on Wikipedia: are they suitable as learning resources for medical students? In: European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology. Band 26, Nummer 2, Februar 2014, S. 155–163, DOI:10.1097/MEG.0000000000000003, PMID 24276492.
  • M. D. Bould, E. S. Hladkowicz, A. A. Pigford, L. A. Ufholz, T. Postonogova, E. Shin, S. Boet: References that anyone can edit: review of Wikipedia citations in peer reviewed health science literature. In: BMJ. Band 348, März 2014, S. g1585, PMID 24603564.
  • L. M. Cabrera-Hernández, C. Wanden-Berghe, C. Curbelo Castro, J. Sanz-Valero: The presence and accuracy of food and nutrition terms in the Spanish and English editions of Wikipedia: in comparison with the Mini Larousse encyclopaedia. In: Nutricion hospitalaria. Band 31, Nummer 1, Oktober 2014, S. 488–493, DOI:10.3305/nh.2015.31.1.8179, PMID 25561146.
  • J. F. Cordier: [Wikipedia: a reliable medical reference?]. In: La Revue du praticien. Band 64, Nummer 7, September 2014, S. 913, PMID 25362765.
  • N. Farič, H. W. Potts: Motivations for contributing to health-related articles on Wikipedia: an interview study. In: Journal of medical Internet research. Band 16, Nummer 12, Dezember 2014, S. e260, DOI:10.2196/jmir.3569, PMID 25498308.
  • L. Fitterling: Wikipedia: proceed with caution. In: The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. Band 114, Nummer 5, Mai 2014, S. 334–335, DOI:10.7556/jaoa.2014.066, PMID 24777995.
  • J. H. Fraser, N. Temple: Wikipedia vs peer-reviewed medical literature for information about the 10 most costly medical conditions-I. In: The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. Band 114, Nummer 10, Oktober 2014, S. 761, DOI:10.7556/jaoa.2014.146, PMID 25288707.
  • N. Generous, G. Fairchild, A. Deshpande, S. Y. Del Valle, R. Priedhorsky: Global disease monitoring and forecasting with Wikipedia. In: PLoS computational biology. Band 10, Nummer 11, November 2014, S. e1003892, DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003892, PMID 25392913.
  • E. Gurzell: Wikipedia vs peer-reviewed medical literature for information about the 10 most costly medical conditions-IV. In: The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. Band 114, Nummer 10, Oktober 2014, S. 765–766, DOI:10.7556/jaoa.2014.149, PMID 25288710.
  • I. Halatchliyski, U. Cress: How structure shapes dynamics: knowledge development in Wikipedia–a network multilevel modeling approach. In: PloS one. Band 9, Nummer 11, 2014, S. e111958, DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0111958, PMID 25365319.
  • C. Harshaw, E. Marcinowski, J. Campbell: Communicating developmental psychobiology to the masses: why psychobiologists should contribute to Wikipedia. In: Developmental psychobiology. Band 56, Nummer 7, November 2014, S. 1439–1441, DOI:10.1002/dev.21239, PMID 25132415.
  • R. T. Hasty, R. C. Garbalosa, V. A. Barbato, P. J. Valdes, D. W. Powers, E. Hernandez, J. S. John, G. Suciu, F. Qureshi, M. Popa-Radu, S. San Jose, N. Drexler, R. Patankar, J. R. Paz, C. W. King, H. N. Gerber, M. G. Valladares, A. A. Somji: Wikipedia vs peer-reviewed medical literature for information about the 10 most costly medical conditions. In: The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. Band 114, Nummer 5, Mai 2014, S. 368–373, DOI:10.7556/jaoa.2014.035, PMID 24778001.
  • J. M. Heilman, J. De Wolff, G. M. Beards, B. J. Basden: Dengue fever: a Wikipedia clinical review. In: Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal. Band 8, Nummer 4, 2014, S. e105–e115, PMID 25426178.
  • Thomas Holbach, Marcus Maurer: Wissenswerte Nachrichten. Agenda-Setting-Effekte zwischen Medienberichterstattung und Online-Informationsverhalten am Beispiel der EHEC-Epidemie. In: Publizistik, Band 59, 1/2014 (Titel bei Springerlink).
  • Katharina Jacob, Friedemann Vogel: Sprachkritik im Internet. Aushandlungsprozesse und Spracheinstellungen auf den Diskussionsseiten der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia. In: Aptum, Band 10(1), 2014, S. 1–32.
  • M. Koo: Complementary and alternative medicine on wikipedia: opportunities for improvement. In: Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM. Band 2014, 2014, S. 105186, DOI:10.1155/2014/105186, PMID 24864148.
  • Arjan M. F. Kozica, Christian Gebhardt, Gordon Müller-Seitz, Stephan Kaiser: Organizational Identity and Paradox. An Analysis of the “Stable State of Instability” of Wikipedia’s Identity. In: Journal of Management Inquiry October, Band 13, 2014 (Abstract).
  • J. Kräenbring, T. Monzon Penza, J. Gutmann, S. Muehlich, O. Zolk, L. Wojnowski, R. Maas, S. Engelhardt, A. Sarikas: Accuracy and completeness of drug information in Wikipedia: a comparison with standard textbooks of pharmacology. In: PloS one. Band 9, Nummer 9, 2014, S. e106930, DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0106930, PMID 25250889.
  • J. Leo, J. R. Lacasse: Wikipedia vs peer-reviewed medical literature for information about the 10 most costly medical conditions-II. In: The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. Band 114, Nummer 10, Oktober 2014, S. 761–764, DOI:10.7556/jaoa.2014.147, PMID 25288708.
  • J. Maskalyk: Modern medicine comes online: How putting Wikipedia articles through a medical journal's traditional process can put free, reliable information into as many hands as possible. In: Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal. Band 8, Nummer 4, 2014, S. e116–e119, PMID 25426179.
  • D. J. McIver, J. S. Brownstein: Wikipedia usage estimates prevalence of influenza-like illness in the United States in near real-time. In: PLoS computational biology. Band 10, Nummer 4, April 2014, S. e1003581, DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003581, PMID 24743682.
  • Aileen Oeberst et al.: Knowledge Construction in Wikipedia: A Systemic-Constructivist Analysis. In: Journal of the Learning Sciences, Band 23, Nummer 2, 2014, doi:10.1080/10508406.2014.888352 (Kurzfassung auf deutsch).
  • A. Oeberst, I. von der Beck, S. Nestler: Reading about explanations enhances perceptions of inevitability and foreseeability: a cross-cultural study with Wikipedia articles. In: Cognitive processing. Band 15, Nummer 3, August 2014, S. 343–349, DOI:10.1007/s10339-014-0603-7, PMID 24573307.
  • J. Phillips, C. Lam, L. Palmisano: Analysis of the accuracy and readability of herbal supplement information on Wikipedia. In: Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA. Band 54, Nummer 4, 2014 Jul-Aug, S. 406–414, DOI:10.1331/JAPhA.2014.13181, PMID 25063262.
  • L. Rasberry: Wikipedia: what it is and why it matters for healthcare. In: BMJ. Band 348, April 2014, S. g2478, PMID 24714406.
  • L. Rasberry: Citing wikipedia. In: BMJ. Band 348, März 2014, S. g1819, PMID 24603566.
  • Thomas Roessing: Enzyklopädie-Amateure als Amateur-Journalisten: Wikipedia als Gateway für aktuelle Ereignisse. In: Studies in Communication | Media (SCM), Ausgabe 3(2), 2014, S. 205–227 (PDF).
  • A. Santillán, M.. Máñez, X. M. Meijome: [Use of Wikipedia by health professionals]. In: Gaceta sanitaria. Band 28, Nummer 6, 2014 Nov-Dec, S. 522, DOI:10.1016/j.gaceta.2014.04.014, PMID 25087118.
  • G. W. Thompson, C. T. Kello: Walking across Wikipedia: a scale-free network model of semantic memory retrieval. In: Frontiers in psychology. Band 5, 2014, S. 86, DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00086, PMID 24575064.
  • S. Vandamme, F. De Turck: Algorithms for recollection of search terms based on the Wikipedia category structure. In: TheScientificWorldJournal. Band 2014, 2014, S. 454868, DOI:10.1155/2014/454868, PMID 24616630.
  • Karl-Heinz Wellmann: Zwischen Befreiungs- und Produktideologie – Schwarmintelligenz am Beispiel der Wikipedia. In: Peter Kemper, Julika Tillmanns und Alf Mentzer (Hrsg.): „Wir nennen es Wirklichkeit“: Denkanstöße zur Netzkultur. Reclam Verlag, Stuttgart 2014, ISBN 978-3-15-020357-6
  • Sahut Gilles, Citez vos sources » : archéologie d'une règle au cœur du savoir wikipédien (2002-2008), 'Études de communication' 1/ 2014 (n° 42), p. 97-110. URL : www.cairn.info/revue-etudes-de-communication-2014-1-page-97.htm.

2013[edit]

  • Mayer, Florian L.: Erfolgsfaktoren von Social Media: Wie "funktionieren" Wikis? Eine vergleichende Analyse kollaborativer Kommunikationssysteme im Internet, in Organisationen und in Gruppen. Dissertation im Fach Kommunikationswissenschaft, Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg. Erschienen im Lit Verlag. ISBN 978-3-643-12210-0

2012[edit]

2011[edit]

  • Lionel Scheepmans et Olivier Servais, Monographie ethnographique de la communauté des contributeurs actifs sur l'espace francophone de Wikipédia, Louvain-la-Neuve, UCL, 2011 (Mémoire de fin de master) On line access.
  • Tobias Lutzi. Et tu, Minerva? – Wikipedia und die Wissenschaft. In: Forschung & Lehre, December 2011, pp. 946–947
  • Daniel K. Schneider, Benetos, K. & Ruchat, M. (2011). Mediawikis for research, teaching and learning. In T. Bastiaens & M. Ebner (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2011 (pp. 2084-2093). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Wiki reprint version. (This is not really research, but an academic design paper)
  • Tunsch, Thomas: Kommunikation für Experten: Kulturelle Gedächtnisorganisationen und vernetzte Arbeitsgemeinschaften. In: EVA 2011 Berlin: 9.-11. November 2011 in den Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin am Kulturforum Potsdamer Platz; Elektronische Medien & Kunst, Kultur, Historie; die 18. Berliner Veranstaltung der Internationalen EVA-Serie Electronic Imaging & the Visual Arts; Konferenzband. – Berlin: Staatliche Museen zu Berlin, Gesellschaft z. Förderung angewandter Informatik, EVA Conferences International, 2011. ISBN 978-3-942709-01-9, ISBN 978-3-942709-02-6 (CD-ROM) – S. 23-42

2010[edit]

  • Daniela Pscheida (2010): Das Wikipedia-Universum. Wie das Internet unsere Wissenskultur verändert. transcript
  • Klaus Wannemacher (2010): Experiences and perspectives of Wikipedia use in higher education. In: International Journal Management in Education, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 79-92.
  • Klaus Wannemacher, Frank Schulenburg (2010): Wikipedia in Academic Studies – Corrupting or Improving the Quality of Teaching and Learning? In: Martin Ebner, Mandy Schiefner (eds.): Looking Toward the Future of Technology-Enhanced Education: Ubiquitous Learning and the Digital Native. Hershey; New York: Information Science Reference, pp. 295–310.
  • Normann Witzleb (2010), Participants in the Community of Knowledge: Experiences with a Wikipedia Writing Assignment for Students in Brayden A. Morris and George M. Ferguson (eds) Computer-Assisted Teaching: New Developments (New York: Nova Sciene Publisher) ISBN 978-1-60876-855-4
  • Ziko van Dijk (2010): The geek shall inherit the earth. Esperanto-movado kaj vikipedia komunumo en la epoko de la Interreto. In: Detlev Blanke, Ulrich Lins (ed.): La arto labori kune. Festschrift for Humphrey Tonkin. Universala Esperanto-Asocio. Rotterdam, pp. 574-584

2009[edit]

  • Robert Neal Baxter (2009): New technologies and terminological pressure in lesser-used languages: The Breton Wikipedia, from terminology consumer to potential terminology provider. In: Language Problems and Language Planning 33 (no. 1, spring), pp. 60-80.
  • Kristine L. Callis, Lindsey R. Christ, Julian Resasco, David W. Armitage, Jeremy D. Ash, Timothy T. Caughlin, Sharon F. Clemmensen, Stella M. Copeland, Timothy J. Fullman, Ryan L. Lynch, Charley Olson, Raya A. Pruner, Ernane H.M. Vieira-Neto, Raneve West-Singh and Emilio M. Bruna: Improving Wikipedia: educational opportunity and professional responsibility In: Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Volume 24, Issue 4, April 2009, Pages 177-179, Online
  • Ziko van Dijk (2009): Wikipedia and lesser-resourced languages. In: Language Problems and Language Planning 33 (no. 3, fall), pp. 234-255.
  • A. Elia (2009): Can a collaborative Wiki Weblish Dictionary Project help academic writing of ICT language learners?” In Teaching Academic and Professional English Online. González-Pueyo, Isabel / Foz Gil, Carmen / Jaime Siso, Mercedes / Luzón Marco, María José (eds.), Peter Lang Publishing Group (ISBN 978-3-03911-582-2 <a href="javascript:Pick it!ISBN: 978-3-03911-582-2"><img style="border: 0px none ;" src="http://www.citavi.com/softlink?linkid=FindIt" alt="Pick It!" title='Titel anhand dieser ISBN in Citavi-Projekt übernehmen'></a> )
  • Joachim Kimmerle, Johannes Moskaliuk and Ulrike Cress (2009): Understanding Learning – the Wiki Way. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration. New York, NY: ACM Press. [1]
  • Johannes Moskaliuk and Joachim Kimmerle (2009): Using wikis for organizational learning: Functional and psycho-social principles. Development and Learning in Organizations, 23 (4), 21-24. [2]
  • Johannes Moskaliuk, Joachim Kimmerle and Ulrike Cress (2009): Wiki-Supported learning and knowledge building: Effects of Incongruity between Knowledge and Information. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25 (6), 549-561. [3]
  • Đorđe Stakić (2009): Wiki technology - origin, development and importance, Infotheca, No. 1-2, Vol. X, Јune 2009. [4]
  • Felipe Ortega (2009): "Wikipedia: A quantitative analysis". PhD. thesis. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería de Telecomunicación. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
  • Klaus Wannemacher (2009): Articles as Assignments – Modalities and Experiences of Wikipedia Use in University Courses. In Marc Spaniol, Qing Li, Ralf Klamma, Rynson W. H. Lau (eds.), Advances in Web Based Learning – ICWL 2009. 8th International Conference. Aachen, Germany, August 19-21, 2009. Proceedings. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. P. 434–443.
  • Normann Witzleb: Engaging with the World: Students of Comparative Law Write for Wikipedia (2009) 9 Legal Education Review 83 – 97.

2008[edit]

  • Erik W. Black (2008): Wikipedia and academic peer review. Wikipedia as a recognised medium for scholarly publication? Online-Information-Review. 2008; 32(1) (pp. 73-88). Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to engage in a thought experiment, exploring the use of Wikipedia or similar content-malleable systems for the review and dissemination of academic knowledge. By looking at other sources, the paper considers the current state of the academic peer-review process, discusses Wikipedia and reflects on dynamic content creation and management applications currently in use in academia. The traditional peer review process must be updated to match the rapid creation and diffusion of knowledge that characterizes the 21st century. The Wikipedia concept is a potential model for more rapid and reliable dissemination of scholarly knowledge. The implications of such a concept would have a dramatic effect on the academic community. This paper promotes a radical idea for changing the methods by which academic knowledge is both constructed and disseminated.
  • Steffen Blaschke and Klaus Stein (2008): Methods and Measures for the Analysis of Corporate Wikis. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association (ICA), May 22-26, Montréal, Canada.
  • Brendan Luyt, Tay Chee Hsien Aaron, Lim Hai Thian and Cheng Kian Hong (2008): Improving Wikipedia's accuracy: Is edit age a solution?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2):318-330.
  • Ulrike Cress and Joachim Kimmerle (2008): A Systemic and Cognitive view on Collaborative Knowledge Building with Wikis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3 (2), 105-122. [5]
  • Andreas Harrer, Johannes Moskaliuk, Joachim Kimmerle and Ulrike Cress(2008): Visualizing Wiki-Supported Knowledge Building: Co-Evolution of Individual and Collective Knowledge. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wikis 2008 (Wikisym). New York, NY: ACM Press. [6]
  • Johannes Moskaliuk and Joachim Kimmerle (2008): Analyse und Visualisierung von Prozessen der Wissenskonstruktion am Beispiel von Wikipedia. In J. Moskaliuk (Hrsg.), Konstruktion und Kommunikation von Wissen mit Wikis (S. 151-162). Boizenburg: Verlag Werner Hülsbusch.
  • Mayer, Florian/Schoeneborn, Dennis (2008): WikiWebs in der Organisationskommunikation. In: Stegbauer, Ch. und Jäckel, M. (Hg.). Social Software. Formen der Kooperation in computerbasierten Netzwerken. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. S. 137-153.
  • Johannes Moskaliuk, Joachim Kimmerle and Ulrike Cress (2008): Learning and Knowledge Building with Wikis: The Impact of Incongruity between People’s Knowledge and a Wiki’s Information. In G. Kanselaar, V. Jonker, P.A. Kirschner, & F.J. Prins (Eds.), International Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Cre8ing a learning world. Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences 2008, vol. 2. (pp. 99-106). Utrecht, The Netherlands: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc. [7]
  • Nielsen, Finn Årup (2008): Clustering of scientific citations in Wikipedia, Wikimania 2008. [8]
  • Felipe Ortega, Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona and Gregorio Robles (2008): On the Inequality of Contributions to Wikipedia. HICSS 2008 (TO APPEAR). [9]
  • Tunsch, Thomas: Museen und Wikis: Vorteile vernetzter Arbeitsgemeinschaften. – MAI-Tagung ("museums and the internet") 2008. URL: http://www.mai-tagung.de/maitagung+2008/mai2008tunschword.pdf (Abgerufen: 19. Januar 2009, 15:50).
  • Tunsch, Thomas: Die Schöne und das Tier: Semantic Web und Wikis. – IN: EVA 2008 Berlin : Elektronische Bildverarbeitung & Kunst, Kultur, Historie, die 15. Berliner Veranstaltung der Internationalen EVA-Serie Electronic Imaging & the Visual Arts. Konferenzband. – Berlin : Staatliche Museen zu Berlin, Gesellschaft z. Förderung angewandter Informatik, EVA Conferences International 2008. – S. 189-197. ISBN 978-3981215816
  • Klaus Wannemacher (2008): Wikipedia − Störfaktor oder Impulsgeber für die Lehre? In S. Zauchner, P. Baumgartner, E. Blaschitz, A. Weissenbäck (Hrsg.), Offener Bildungsraum Hochschule. Freiheiten und Notwendigkeiten. Münster, New York, München et al.: Waxmann. S. 147–156. [10]

2007[edit]

  • Gabrilovich, Evgeniy; Markovitch, Shaul (2007): Computing Semantic Relatedness using Wikipedia-based Explicit Semantic Analysis. Proceedings of The 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Hyderabad, India, January 2007 [12]
  • Geser, Hans (2007): From printed to "wikified" encyclopedias: Sociological Aspects of an Incipient Cultural Revolution. Institute of Sociology at the University of Zurich. http://socio.ch/intcom/t_hgeser16.htm
  • Grotjahn, Henrik (2007): Qualitätsmessungen an der Wikipedia. Konstruktion von Qualität – eine Metaanalyse. Saarbrücken: VDM, ISBN 978-3-8364-3045-6
  • Möllenkamp, Andreas (2007): Wer schreibt die Wikipedia? Die Online-Enzyklopädie in der Vorstellungs- und Lebenswelt ihrer aktivsten Autoren. Magisterarbeit, Institut für Kulturwissenschaften, Universität Leipzig 2007 (online)
  • Ortega, Felipe; Gonzalez-Barahona, Jesus M. (2007): Quantitative Analysis of the Wikipedia Community of Users. WikiSym 2007, Montreal, Canada. [14]
  • Ortega, Felipe; Gonzalez-Barahona, Jesus M.; Robles, Gregorio (2007): The Top Ten Wikipedias: A quantitative analysis using WikiXRay. ICSOFT 2007. [15]
  • Pentzold, Christian; Seidenglanz, Sebastian; Fraas, Claudia; Ohler, Peter (2007): Wikis. Bestandsaufnahme eines Forschungsfeldes und Skizzierung eines integrativen Analyserahmens. In: Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft. 55(1), 61-79.
  • Philipp, Torsten (2007). Anwendung von Mancur Olsons "Logik des kollektiven Handelns" auf das Kollektivgut Wissen auf Wikipedia.[16]
  • Priedhorsky, Reid; Chen, Jilin Chen; Lam, Shyong (Tony) K.; Panciera, Katherine ; Terveen, Loren; Riedl, John (2007): Creating, Destroying, and Restoring Value in Wikipedia. Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Minnesota. [17]
  • Schulenburg, Frank; Raschka, Achim; Jungierek, Michail: Der „McDonald’s der Informationen“? Ein Blick hinter die Kulissen des kollaborativen Wissensmanagements in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia, in: Bibliothek, Forschung und Praxis 31,2 (2007), ISSN 0341-4183, p. 225–230 (engl. The “McDonald’s of information”? A view behind the scenery of the collaborative knowledge management of the German language Wikipedia) — Published under CC-by-SA, Download (PDF, 562 KB) via Wikimedia Commons.
  • Schulenburg, Frank: Zu den Zielen und grundlegenden Funktionsweisen der freien Internetenzyklopädie Wikipedia und den Besonderheiten der deutschsprachigen Ausgabe, in: Gerhard Fuchs, Christian Müller, Harald Ritz und Uwe Saint-Mont (Hrsg.), Herausforderungen an die Wirtschaftsinformatik: Wissensmanagement, E-Business und ereignisgesteuerte Geschäftsprozesse in Echtzeit, Tagungsband zur AKWI-Fachtagung am 14.09.2007 an der Hochschule Fulda, Berlin 2007, ISBN 978-3-936527-10-0 <a href="javascript:Pick it!ISBN: 978-3-936527-10-0"><img style="border: 0px none ;" src="http://www.citavi.com/softlink?linkid=FindIt" alt="Pick It!" title='Titel anhand dieser ISBN in Citavi-Projekt übernehmen'></a> , p. 25–36.
  • Tunsch, Thomas (2007): Museen und Wikipedia. In: Gesellschaft zur Förderung angewandter Informatik, EVA Conferences International (eds). EVA 2007 Berlin, die 14. Berliner Veranstaltung der Internationalen EVA-Serie Electronic Imaging & the Visual Arts. Berlin: Gesellschaft zur Förderung angewandter Informatik, EVA Conferences International. (7th—9th Nov 2007). 87. 15–21. ISBN 3-9809212-8-X
  • Viégas, Fernanda (2007): The Visual Side of Wikipedia. Proceedings of Hawaiian International Conference of Systems Sciences. Big Island, Hawaii.
  • Viégas, Fernanda; Wattenberg, Martin; Kriss, Jesse; van Ham, Frank (2007): Talk Before You Type: Coordination in Wikipedia. Proceedings of Hawaiian International Conference of Systems Sciences. Big Island, Hawaii.
  • Zesch, Torsten; Gurevych, Iryna (2007): Analysis of the Wikipedia Category Graph for NLP Applications. Proceedings of the TextGraphs-2 Workshop (NAACL-HLT). [18]
  • Zesch, Torsten; Gurevych, Iryna; Mühlhäuser, Max (2007): Comparing Wikipedia and German Wordnet by Evaluating Semantic Relatedness on Multiple Datasets. Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL-HLT). [19]
  • Zesch, Torsten; Gurevych, Iryna; Mühlhäuser, Max (2007): Analyzing and Accessing Wikipedia as a Lexical Semantic Resource. Biannual Conference of the Society for Computational Linguistics and Language Technology. pp. 213-221.

2006[edit]

  • Elia A. (2006), An analysis of Wikipedia digital writing (ISBN 1-9324-32-61-2) Proceedings EACL 2006 Trento, - 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics – aprile 3-7, pp. 16-21
  • Pentzold, Christian (2006): Dispositiv, Diskurs, Diskursfragment. Zum Vorschlag eines diskurstheoretischen, Foucault-inspirierten Analyserahmens für die Online-Enzyklpädie Wikipedia. In: LINSE - Linguistik Server Essen. [20]
  • Bower, B., Woo, K., Roberts, M., Watters, P. (2006) Wiki Pedagogy - A Tale of Two Wikis. Paper presented at the ITHET Conference, Sydney Australia. [21]
  • Karim R. Lakhani, Andrew P. McAfee: Case-Study, Harvard Business School, Dezember 2006 [22]
  • Buriol, L.S., Castillo, C., Donato , D., Leonardi , S., and Millozzi , S. (2006): Temporal Analysis of the Wikigraph. To appear in Proceedings of the Web Intelligence Conference (WI), Hong Kong 2006. Published by IEEE CS Press. [23]
  • Forte, Andrea and Amy Bruckman. (2006) From Wikipedia to the classroom: exploring online publication and learning. Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Vol 1. Bloomington, IN, pp. 182-188. [24]
  • Fuchs, Ulrich (2006). Freie Inhalte? - Idee und Realisierung am Beispiel der Wikipedia, in Ohly,Sieglerschmidt, Swertz (Hrsg.): Wissensorganisation und Verantwortung: Gesellschaftliche, ökonomische und technische Aspekte. Proceedings der 9. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Duisburg 5.-7. November 2004, pp. 192-198, Ergon Verlag, Würzburg 2006 [25]
  • Gabrilovich, Evgeniy and Shaul Markovitch (2006). Overcoming the Brittleness Bottleneck using Wikipedia: Enhancing Text Categorization with Encyclopedic Knowledge. Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-06), pp. 1301-1306. [26]
  • Grzega, Joachim (2006), How Oonomasiologists Can Help with Contributing to Wikipedia, Onomasiology Online, Vol. 7, 1-15 [27].
  • Kolbitsch, Josef, and Maurer, Hermann (2006). The Transformation of the Web: How Emerging Communities Shape the Information We Consume. In: Journal of Universal Computer Science, (12) 2, 187–213. [28].
  • Kolbitsch, Josef, and Maurer, Hermann (2006). Community Building around Encyclopaedic Knowledge. In: Journal of Computing and Information Technology – CIT, Zagreb : Sveučilišni računski centar, Vol. 14, No. 3, rujan (September) 2006, pp. 175–190. [29].
  • Korfiatis, N., Poulos, M., & Bokos, G. (2006). Evaluating authoritative sources using social networks: An insight from wikipedia. Online Information Review: 30(3). [30]
  • Krizhanovsky, Andrew (2006). Synonym search in Wikipedia: Synarcher. In: 11-th International Conference "Speech and Computer" SPECOM'2006. Russia, St. Petersburg, June 25-29, pp. 474-477. [31], [32].
  • Levrel, Julien (2006). Wikipedia : Un dispositif médiatique de publics participants. In: Réseaux, n° 138.
  • Mehler, Alexander (2006): Text Linkage in the Wiki Medium - A Comparative Study. In: Proceedings of the EACL 2006 Workshop on New Text - Wikis and blogs and other dynamic text sources, Trento, Italy, April 3-7, pp. 1-8. [33].
  • Niemann, Hans-Joachim (2006), "Was alle angeht, können nur alle lösen" – Über die weltweite Anwendung des Kritischen Rationalismus in Wiki-Projekten. In: Aufklärung und Kritik, Heft 1 (2006), S. 67-93 [34].
  • Quiggin, John (2006), Blogs, wikis and creative innovation, International Journal of Cultural Studies, Vol. 9, No. 4, 481-496 [35] .
  • Rick, Jochen & Guzdial, Mark (2006). Situating CoWeb: A scholarship of application. In: International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1):89–115. [36]
  • Schaffert, Sebastian: IkeWiki: A Semantic Wiki for Collaborative Knowledge Management. . In: 1st International Workshop on Semantic Technologies in Collaborative Applications STICA 06, Manchester, UK, June 2006. [37]
  • Schaffert, Sebastian; Bischof, Diana; Bürger, Tobias; Gruber, Andreas; Hilzensauer, Wolf; & Schaffert, Sandra: Learning with Semantic Wikis. In: First Workshop "SemWiki2006 - From Wiki to Semantics", co-located with the 3rd Annual European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), Budva, Montenegro, 11th - 14th June, 2006 [38]
  • Wagner, Christian, Cheung, Karen, Ip, Rachael, and Bottcher, Stefan (2006). Building Semantic Webs for e-government with Wiki technology. In: Electronic Government, 3 (1), 36-55. [39].

2005[edit]

  • Bryant, Susan, Andrea Forte and Amy Bruckman. (2005). “Becoming Wikipedian: Transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia” Proceedings of GROUP International Conference on Supporting Group Work, 2005. pp 1.-10. [40]
  • Erpicum, Martin (2005) : d'Amour et de Neutralité : Ce(ux) qui résiste(nt). pp. 1. -95. (Sociologist at the University of Liège, Belgium, Master Thesis) [41]
  • Frumkin, Jeremy (2005): The Wiki and the digital library. In: OCLC Systems and Services, 21(1), pp.18-22
  • Levrel, Julien (2005): Organisation de Wikipedia et motivations des participants. Preleminary Report in two parts.

For information on referencing citations in Wikipedia articles, see Help:Footnotes, Wikipedia:Inline citation, and Help:Referencing for beginners.

For information about citing Wikipedia articles for use in work outside of Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:Citing Wikipedia.

"WP:CS" redirects here. For the essay about using common sense, see WP:UCS. For WikiProject Computer Science, see WP:COMPSCI.

"WP:REF" redirects here. For the Wikipedia Reference desk, see WP:RD.

A citation, also called a reference,[1] uniquely identifies a source of information, e.g.:

Ritter, R. M. (2002). The Oxford Style Manual. Oxford University Press. p. 1.

Wikipedia's Verifiability policy requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations, anywhere in article space.

A citation or reference in an article usually has two parts. In the first part, each section of text that is either based on, or quoted from, an outside source is marked as such with an inline citation. The inline citation may be a superscript footnote number, or an abbreviated version of the citation called a short citation. The second necessary part of the citation or reference is the list of full references, which provides complete, formatted detail about the source, so that anyone reading the article can find it and verify it.

This page explains how to place and format both parts of the citation. Each article should use one citation method or style throughout. If an article already has citations, preserve consistency by using that method or seek consensus on the talk page before changing it (the principle is reviewed at § Variation in citation methods). While you should try to write citations correctly, what matters most is that you provide enough information to identify the source. Others will improve the formatting if needed. Help:Referencing for beginners provides a brief introduction on how to reference Wikipedia articles.

Types of citation

  • A full citation fully identifies a reliable source and, where applicable, the place in that source (such as a page number) where the information in question can be found. For example: Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, 1971, p. 1. This type of citation is usually given as a footnote, and is the most commonly used citation method in Wikipedia articles.
  • An inline citation means any citation added close to the material it supports, for example after the sentence or paragraph, normally in the form of a footnote.
  • A short citation is an inline citation that identifies the place in a source where specific information can be found, but without giving full details of the source – these will have been provided in a full bibliographic citation either in an earlier footnote, or in a separate section. For example: Rawls 1971, p. 1. This system is used in some articles; the short citations may be given either as footnotes, or as parenthetical references within the text.
  • In-text attribution involves adding the source of a statement to the article text, such as Rawls argues that X.[5] This is done whenever a writer or speaker should be credited, such as with quotations, close paraphrasing, or statements of opinion or uncertain fact. The in-text attribution does not give full details of the source – this is done in a footnote in the normal way. See In-text attribution below.
  • A general reference is a citation that supports content, but is not linked to any particular piece of material in the article through an inline citation. General references are usually listed at the end of the article in a References section. They are usually found in underdeveloped articles, especially when all article content is supported by a single source. They may also be listed in more developed articles as a supplement to inline citations.

When and why to cite sources

By citing sources for Wikipedia content, you enable users to verify that the information given is supported by reliable sources, thus improving the credibility of Wikipedia while showing that the content is not original research. You also help users find additional information on the subject; and by giving attribution you avoid plagiarising the source of your words or ideas.

In particular, sources are required for material that is challenged or likely to be challenged – if reliable sources cannot be found for challenged material, it is likely to be removed from the article. Sources are also required when quoting someone, with or without quotation marks, or closely paraphrasing a source. However, the citing of sources is not limited to those situations – editors are always encouraged to add or improve citations for any information contained in an article.

Citations are especially desirable for statements about living persons, particularly when the statements are contentious or potentially defamatory. In accordance with the biography of living persons policy, unsourced information of this type is likely to be removed on sight.

Multimedia

For an image or other media file, details of its origin and copyright status should appear on its file page. Image captions should be referenced as appropriate just like any other part of the article. A citation is not needed for descriptions such as alt text that are verifiable directly from the image itself, or for text that merely identifies a source (e.g., the caption "Belshazzar's Feast (1635)" for File:Rembrandt-Belsazar.jpg).

When not to cite

Citations are not used on disambiguation pages (sourcing for the information given there should be done in the target articles). Citations are often omitted from the lead section of an article, insofar as the lead summarizes information for which sources are given later in the article, although quotations and controversial statements, particularly if about living persons, should be supported by citations even in the lead. See WP:LEADCITE for more information.

Inline citations

Further information: Wikipedia:Inline citation

Inline citations allow the reader to associate a given bit of material in an article with the specific reliable source(s) that support it. Inline citations are added using either footnotes (long or short) or parenthetical references. This section describes how to add either type, and also describes how to create a list of full bibliography citations to support shortened footnotes or parenthetical references.

If long or short inline citations placed in footnotes are used, the first editor to add footnotes to an article must create a section where the list of those citations is to appear. This is not necessary for inline parenthetical references, as these appear directly inline in the article prose.

See also: Help:Footnotes

How to create the list of citations

This section, if needed, is usually titled "Notes" or "References", and is placed at or near the bottom of the article. For more about the order and titles of sections at the end of an article (which may also include "Further reading" and "External links" sections), see Wikipedia:Footers.

With some exceptions discussed below, citations appear in a single section containing only the tag or the template. For example:

== References == {{Reflist}}

The footnotes will then automatically be listed under that section heading. Each numbered footnote marker in the text is a clickable link to the corresponding footnote, and each footnote contains a caret that links back to the corresponding point in the text. Scrolling lists, or lists of citations appearing within a scroll box, should never be used. This is because of issues with readability, browser compatibility, accessibility, printing, and site mirroring.[2]

If an article contains a list of general references, this is usually placed in a separate section, titled (for example) "References". This usually comes immediately after the section(s) listing footnotes, if any. (If the general references section is called "References", then the citations section is usually called "Notes".)

How to place an inline citation using ref tags

Further information: Footnotes: the basics

To create a footnote, use the syntax at the appropriate place in the article text, for example:

    which will be displayed as something like:

    • Justice is a human invention.[1] It...

    It will also be necessary to generate the list of footnotes (where the citation text is actually displayed); for this, see the previous section.

    As in the above example, citation markers are normally placed after adjacent punctuation such as periods and commas. Citations should not be placed within, or on the same line as, section headings. For exceptions, see the Punctuation and footnotes section of the Manual of Style. Note also that no space is added before the citation marker.

    The citation should be added close to the material it supports, offering text–source integrity. If a word or phrase is particularly contentious, an inline citation may be added next to that word or phrase within the sentence, but it is usually sufficient to add the citation to the end of the clause, sentence, or paragraph, so long as it's clear which source supports which part of the text.

    Repeated citations

    Further information: Footnotes: using a source more than once

    For multiple use of the same inline citation or footnote, you can use the named references feature, choosing a name to identify the inline citation, and typing . Thereafter, the same named reference may be reused any number of times either before or after the defining use by typing just . The use of the slash before the means that the tag is self-closing, and the used to close other references must not be used in addition.

    The text of the can be almost anything‍—‌apart from being completely numeric. If spaces are used in the text of the , the text must be placed within double quotes. Placing all named references within double quotes may be helpful to future editors who do not know that rule. To help with page maintenance, it is recommended that the text of the have a connection to the inline citation or footnote, for example "author year page": .

    If an article contains both footnoted citations and other (explanatory) footnotes, then it is possible (but not necessary) to divide them into two separate lists, using the grouping feature described in the Grouping footnotes section of the footnotes help page. The explanatory footnotes and the citations are then placed in separate sections, called (for example) "Notes" and "References" respectively.

    Avoiding clutter

    Inline references can significantly bloat the wikitext in the edit window and can become difficult and confusing. There are two main methods to avoid clutter in the edit window:

    • Inserting short citations (see below) that then refer to a full list of source texts
      • Parenthetical references (see below) are an established subformat of this, which forgoes the use of inline notes and simply puts the short citation in the main body.
    • Using list-defined references by collecting the full citation code within the reference list template, and then inserting them in the text with tags.

    As with other citation formats, articles should not undergo large-scale conversion between formats without consensus to do so.

    Note, however, that references defined in the reference list template can no longer be edited with the VisualEditor.

    Citing multiple pages of the same source

    Further information: Help:References and page numbers

    When an article cites many different pages from the same source, to avoid the redundancy of many big, nearly identical full citations, most Wikipedia editors use one of three options:

    The use of ibid. or Id. (or similar abbreviations) is discouraged, as these may become broken as new references are added (op. cit. is less problematic in that it should refer explicitly to a citation contained in the article; however, not all readers are familiar with the meaning of the terms). If the use of ibid is extensive, use the {{ibid}} template.

    Duplicate citations

    Please combine precisely duplicated full citations, in keeping with the existing citation style (if any). Do not discourage editors, particularly inexperienced ones, from adding duplicate citations when the use of the source is appropriate, because a duplicate is usually better than no citation. But any editor should feel free to combine them, and doing so is the best practice on Wikipedia.

    Citations to different pages or parts of the same source can also be combined (preserving the distinct parts of the citations), as described in the previous section. Any method that is consistent with the existing citation style (if any) may be used, or consensus can be sought to change the existing style.

    Short citations

    Main page: Help:Shortened footnotes

    Some Wikipedia articles use short citations, giving summary information about the source together with a page number, as in . These are used together with full citations, which give full details of the sources, but without page numbers, and are listed in a separate "References" section. Short citations are used in articles that apply parenthetical referencing (see below), but they can also be used as footnote citations, as described here.

    Forms of short citations used include author-date referencing (APA style, Harvard style, or Chicago style), and author-title or author-page referencing (MLA style or Chicago style). As before, the list of footnotes is automatically generated in a "Notes" or "Footnotes" section, which immediately precedes the "References" section containing the full citations to the source. Short citations can be written manually, or by using the or templates. (Note that templates should not be added without consensus to an article that already uses a consistent referencing style.) The short citations and full citations may be linked so that the reader can click on the short note to find full information about the source. See the template documentation for details and solutions to common problems. For variations with and without templates, see wikilinks to full references. For a set of realistic examples, see these.

    This is how short citations look in the edit box:

    The Sun is pretty big,<ref>Miller 2005, p. 23.</ref> but the Moon is not so big.<ref>Brown 2006, p. 46.</ref> The Sun is also quite hot.<ref>Miller 2005, p. 34.</ref>== Notes =={{Reflist}}== References == *Brown, Rebecca (2006). "Size of the Moon", ''Scientific American'', 51(78). *Miller, Edward (2005). ''The Sun''. Academic Press.

    This is how they look in the article:

    The Sun is pretty big, but the Moon is not so big. The Sun is also quite hot.

    Notes



    References


    • Brown, Rebecca (2006). "Size of the Moon", Scientific American, 51(78).
    • Miller, Edward (2005). The Sun. Academic Press.

    Shortened notes using titles rather than publication dates would look like this in the article:

    Notes


    When using manual links it is easy to introduce errors such as duplicate anchors and unused references. The script User:Ucucha/HarvErrors will show many related errors. Duplicate anchors may be found by using the W3C Markup Validation Service.

    Parenthetical referencing

    Further information: Wikipedia:Parenthetical referencing

    While most articles use footnote citations as described in the above sections, some articles use a parenthetical referencing style. Here, short citations in parentheses, such as (Smith 2010, p. 1), are placed within the article text itself. Full details of each source used are given in a full citation, e.g., Smith, John. Name of Book. Cambridge University Press, 2010. The full citations are listed in alphabetical order, according to the authors' surnames, at the end of the article in a "References" section.

    Several forms of short citation are used in Wikipedia; see Short citations above. The inline citation and full citation may be linked using a template (see linking inline and full citations); as with other citation templates, these should not be added to articles without consensus.

    This is how it looks in the edit box:

    The Sun is pretty big (Miller 2005, p. 1), but the Moon is not so big (Brown 2006, p. 2). The Sun is also quite hot (Miller 2005, p. 3). == References == *Brown, R (2006). "Size of the Moon", ''Scientific American'', 51(78). *Miller, E (2005). ''The Sun'', Academic Press.

    This is how it looks in the article:

    The Sun is pretty big (Miller 2005, p. 1), but the Moon is not so big (Brown 2006, p. 2). The Sun is also quite hot (Miller 2005, p. 3).

    References


    • Brown, R (2006). "Size of the Moon", Scientific American, 51(78).
    • Miller, E (2005). The Sun, Academic Press.

    Notice that, unlike footnotes, parenthetical references are placed before adjacent punctuation such as commas and periods.

    What information to include

    Listed below is the information that a typical inline citation or general reference will provide, though other details may be added as necessary. This information is included in order to identify the source, assist readers in finding it, and (in the case of inline citations) indicate the place in the source where the information is to be found. (If an article uses parenthetical referencing or short citations, then the inline citations will refer to this information in abbreviated form, as described in the relevant sections above.)

    Examples

    Books

    See also the template {{cite book}}.

    Citations for books typically include:

    • name of author(s)
    • title of book in italics
    • translated title of book in square brackets after the title if not in English (optional)
    • volume when appropriate
    • name of publisher
    • city of publication, e.g. London: Routledge (optional)
    • year of publication of the edition you are citing
    • original year of publication in square brackets, e.g. 2017 [1972] (optional)
    • chapter or page numbers cited, if appropriate
    • edition, if not the first edition
    • ISBN (optional)
    Citations for individually authored chapters in books typically include:
    • name of author(s)
    • title of the chapter
    • translated title of the chapter book if not in English (optional)
    • name of book's editor
    • name of book and other details as above
    • chapter number or page numbers for the chapter (optional)

    In some instances, the verso of a book may record, "Reprinted with corrections XXXX" or similar, where 'XXXX' is a year. This is a different version of a book in the same way that different editions are different versions. In such a case, record: the year of the particular reprint, the edition immediately prior to this particular reprint (if not the first edition) and a note to say "Reprint with corrections". If {{cite}} (or similar) is being used, the notation, "Reprint with corrections", can be added immediately following the template. Reprints of older publications gives an example of appending a similar textual note.

    Journal articles

    See also the template {{cite journal}}.

    Citations for journal articles typically include:

    • name of the author(s)
    • year and sometimes month of publication
    • title of the article within quotation marks
    • translated title of the article in square brackets after the title if not in English
    • name of the journal in italics
    • volume number, issue number, and page numbers (article numbers in some electronic journals)
    • DOI and/or other identifiers are optional

    Newspaper articles

    See also the template {{cite news}}.

    Citations for newspaper articles typically include:

    • byline (author's name), if any
    • title of the article within quotation marks
    • translated title of the article in square brackets after the title if not in English
    • name of the newspaper in italics
    • city of publication (if not included in name of newspaper), in parentheses
    • date of publication (the "{{Cite news}}" template places the date after the byline if there is one)
    • page number(s) are optional

    Web pages

    See also the template {{cite web}}.

    Citations for World Wide Web pages typically include:

    • URL of the web page – that is the URL of the web page where the referenced content can be found, not, e.g., the main page of a website when the content is on a subpage of that website (see Wikipedia:Shallow references)
    • name of the author(s)
    • title of the article within quotation marks
    • translated title of the article in square brackets after the title if not in English
    • title or domain name of the website
    • publisher, if known
    • date of publication
    • page number(s) (if applicable)
    • the date you retrieved (or accessed) the web page (required if the publication date is unknown)

    Sound recordings

    Further information: Help:References and page numbers § Other in-source locations

    Citations for sound recordings typically include:

    • name of the composer(s), songwriter(s), script writer(s) or the like
    • name of the performer(s)
    • title of the song or individual track in quotation marks
    • title of the album in italics (if applicable)
    • name of the record label
    • year of release
    • medium (for example: LP, audio cassette, CD, MP3 file)
    • approximate time at which event or point of interest occurs, where appropriate

    Do not cite an entire body of work by one performer. Instead, make one citation for each work your text relies on.

    Film, television, or video recordings

    See also the template {{cite AV media}}.

    Citations for films, TV episodes, or video recordings typically include:

    • name of the director
    • name of the producer, if relevant
    • names of major performers
    • for a TV episode, the title of the episode in quotation marks
    • title of the film or TV series in italics
    • name of the studio
    • year of release
    • medium (for example: film, videocassette, DVD)
    • approximate time at which event or point of interest occurs, where appropriate

    Other

    See also the template {{cite album notes}}.

    See also the template {{cite comic}}.

    See also the template {{comic strip reference}}.

    See also the template {{cite conference}} for conference reports or papers.

    See also the template {{cite court}} for court cases or legal decisions.

    See also the template {{cite encyclopedia}}.

    See also the template {{cite episode}} for TV or radio series.

    See also the template {{cite mailing list}}.

    See also the template {{cite map}}.

    See also the template {{cite newsgroup}}.

    See also the template {{citation}} for patents.

    See also the template {{cite press release}}.

    See also the template {{cite thesis}}.

    See also the template {{cite video game}}.

    Identifying parts of a source

    Further information: Help:References and page numbers

    When citing lengthy sources, you should identify which part of a source is being cited.

    Books and print articles

    Specify the page number or range of page numbers. Page numbers are not required for a reference to the book or article as a whole. When you specify a page number, it is helpful to specify the version (date and edition for books) of the source because the layout, pagination, length, etc. can change between editions.

    If there are no page numbers, whether in ebooks or print materials, then you can use other means of identifying the relevant section of a lengthy work, such as the chapter number or the section title.

    In some works, such as plays and ancient works, there are standard methods of referring to sections, such as "Act 1, scene 2" for plays and Bekker numbers for Aristotle's works. Use these methods whenever appropriate.

    Audio and video sources

    Specify the time at which the event or other point of interest occurs. Be as precise as possible about the version of the source that you are citing; for example, movies are often released in different editions or "cuts". Due to variations between formats and playback equipment, precision may not be accurate in some cases. However, many government agencies do not publish minutes and transcripts but do post video of official meetings online; generally the subcontractors who handle audio-visual are quite precise.

    Links and ID numbers

    A citation ideally includes a link or ID number to help editors locate the source. If you have a URL (web page) link, you can add it to the title part of the citation, so that when you add the citation to Wikipedia the URL becomes hidden and the title becomes clickable. To do this, enclose the URL and the title in square brackets—the URL first, then a space, then the title. For example:

    Carr A, Ory D (2006). [http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030496 "Does HIV cause cardiovascular disease?"]''PLoS Medicine'', 3(11):e496.

    For web-only sources with no publication date, the "Retrieved" date (or the date you accessed the web page) should be included, in case the web page changes in the future. For example: Retrieved 15 July 2011 or you can use the accessdate parameter in the automatic Wikipedia:refToolbar 2.0 editing window feature.

    You can also add an ID number to the end of a citation. The ID number might be an ISBN for a book, a DOI (digital object identifier) for an article, or any of several ID numbers that are specific to particular article databases, such as a PMID number for articles on PubMed. It may be possible to format these so that they are automatically activated and become clickable when added to Wikipedia, for example by typing ISBN (or PMID) followed by a space and the ID number.

    If your source is not available online, it should be available in reputable libraries, archives, or collections. If a citation without an external link is challenged as unavailable, any of the following is sufficient to show the material to be reasonably available (though not necessarily reliable): providing an ISBN or OCLC number; linking to an established Wikipedia article about the source (the work, its author, or its publisher); or directly quoting the material on the talk page, briefly and in context.

    Linking to pages in PDF files

    Links to long PDF documents can be made more convenient by taking readers to a specific page with the addition of to the document URL, where is the page number. For example, using as the citation URL displays page five of the document in any PDF viewer that supports this feature. If the viewer or browser does not support it, it will display the first page instead.

    Linking to Google Books pages

    Further information: Wikipedia talk:Citing sources/Archive 29 § Linking to Google Books pages

    Google Books sometimes allows numbered book pages to be linked to directly. These can be added in several ways (with and without citation templates):

    In edit mode, the URL for p. 18 of A Theory of Justice can be entered like this using the {{Cite book}} template:

    {{cite book |last=Rawls |first=John |title=A Theory of Justice |publisher=Harvard University Press |date=1971 |page=18 |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=kvpby7HtAe0C&pg=PA18}}

    or like this, in the first of the above examples, formatted manually:

    Rawls, John. [https://books.google.com/books?id=kvpby7HtAe0C&pg=PA18 ''A Theory of Justice'']. Harvard University Press, 1971, p. 18.

    When the page number is a Roman numeral, commonly seen at the beginning of books, the URL looks like this for page xvii (Roman numeral 17) of the same book:
         
    The indicates "page, Roman, 17", in contrast to the , "page, Arabic, 18" the URL given earlier.

    You can also link to a tipped-in page, such as an unnumbered page of images between two regular pages. (If the page contains an image that is protected by copyright, it will be replaced by a tiny notice saying "copyrighted image".) The URL for eleventh tipped-in page inserted after page 304 of The Selected Papers of Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony, looks like this:
         
    The can be interpreted as "page, Arabic, 304; inserted after: 11".

    Page links should only be added when the book is available for preview; they will not work with snippet view. Keep in mind that availability varies by location. No editor is required to add page links, but if another editor adds them, they should not be removed without cause; see the October 2010 RfC for further information.

    Note that the Citation Style 1, Citation Style 2 and Citation Style Vancouver templates properly support links only in the and parameters. Placing links in the or parameters may not link properly and will cause mangled COinS metadata output.

    There is a Wikipedia citation tool for Google Books that may be helpful.

    Say where you read it

    "Say where you read it" follows the practice in academic writing of citing sources directly only if you have read the source yourself. If your knowledge of the source is secondhand—that is, if you have read Jones (2010), who cited Smith (2009), and you want to use what Smith (2009) said—make clear that your knowledge of Smith is based on your reading of Jones.

    When citing the source, write the following (this formatting is just an example):

    John Smith (2009). Name of Book I Haven't Seen, Cambridge University Press, p. 99, cited in Paul Jones (2010). Name of Encyclopedia I Have Seen, Oxford University Press, p. 29.

    Or if you are using short citations:

    Smith (2009), p. 99, cited in Jones (2010), p. 29.

    Note: The advice to "say where you read it" does not mean that you have to give credit to any sources, search engines, websites, library catalogs, archives, etc., that led you to Smith's book. If you have read Smith's book yourself, that's all you have to cite. You do not need to specify how you obtained and read Smith's book.

    So long as you are confident that you read a true and accurate copy, it does not matter whether you read the book using an online service like Google Books; using preview options at a bookseller's website like Amazon; on an e-reader (except to the extent that this affects page numbering); through your library; via online paid databases of scanned publications, such as JSTOR; using reading machines; or any other method.

    Dates and reprints of older publications

    Editors should be aware that older sources (especially those in the public domain) are sometimes reprinted with modern publication dates. When this occurs and the citation style being used requires it, cite both the original publication date, as well as the date of the re-publication. E.g.:

    • Darwin, Charles (1964) [1859]. On the Origin of Species (facsimile of 1st ed.). Harvard University Press. 

    This is done automatically in the {{citation}} and {{cite book}} templates when you use the parameter.

    Alternately, information about the reprint can be appended as a textual note:

    • Boole, George (1854). An Investigation of the Laws of Thought on Which are Founded the Mathematical Theories of Logic and Probabilities. Macmillan.  Reprinted with corrections, Dover Publications, New York, NY, 1958.

    Seasonal publication dates and differing calendar systems

    Publication dates, for both older and recent sources, should be written with the goal of helping the reader find the publication and, once found, confirm that the correct publication has been located. For example, if the publication date bears a date in the Julian calendar, it should not be converted to the Gregorian calendar.

    If the publication date was given as a season or holiday, such as "Winter" or "Christmas" of a particular year or two-year span, it should not be converted to a month or date, such as July–August or December 25. If a publication provided both seasonal and specific dates, prefer the specific one.

    Additional annotation

    In most cases it is sufficient for a citation footnote simply to identify the source (as described in the sections above); readers can then consult the source to see how it supports the information in the article. Sometimes, however, it is useful to include additional annotation in the footnote, for example to indicate precisely which information the source is supporting (particularly when a single footnote lists more than one source – see § Bundling citations and § Text–source integrity, below).

    A footnote may also contain a relevant exact quotation from the source. This is especially helpful when the cited text is long or dense. A quotation allows readers to immediately identify the applicable portion of the reference. Quotes are also useful if the source is not easily accessible.

    In the case of non-English sources, it may be helpful to quote from the original text and then give an English translation. If the article itself contains a translation of a quote from such a source (without the original), then the original should be included in the footnote. (See the WP:Verifiability § Non-English sources policy for more information.)

    Citation style

    While citations should aim to provide the information listed above, Wikipedia does not have a single house style, though citations within any given article should follow a consistent style. A number of citation styles exist including those described in the Wikipedia articles for Citation, APA style, ASA style, MLA style, The Chicago Manual of Style, Author-date referencing, the Vancouver system and Bluebook.

    Although nearly any consistent style may be used, avoid all-numeric date formats other than YYYY-MM-DD, because of the ambiguity concerning which number is the month and which the day. For example, 2002-06-11 may be used, but not 11/06/2002. The YYYY-MM-DD format should in any case be limited to Gregorian calendar dates where the year is after 1582.

    Variation in citation methods

    Editors should not attempt to change an article's established citation style merely on the grounds of personal preference, to make it match other articles, or without first seeking consensus for the change. The arbitration committee ruled in 2006:

    Wikipedia does not mandate styles in many different areas; these include (but are not limited to) American vs. British spelling, date formats, and citation style. Where Wikipedia does not mandate a specific style, editors should not attempt to convert Wikipedia to their own preferred style, nor should they edit articles for the sole purpose of converting them to their preferred style, or removing examples of, or references to, styles which they dislike.

    As with spelling differences, it is normal practice to defer to the style used by the first major contributor or adopted by the consensus of editors already working on the page, unless a change in consensus has been achieved. If the article you are editing is already using a particular citation style, you should follow it; if you believe it is inappropriate for the needs of the article, seek consensus for a change on the talk page. If you are the first contributor to add citations to an article, you may choose whichever style you think best for the article.

    If all or most of the citations in an article consist of bare URLs, or otherwise fail to provide needed bibliographic data – such as the name of the source, the title of the article or web page consulted, the author (if known), the publication date (if known), and the page numbers (where relevant) – then that would not count as a "consistent citation style" and can be changed freely to insert such data. The data provided should be sufficient to uniquely identify the source, allow readers to find it, and allow readers to initially evaluate it without retrieving it.

    To be avoided

    When an article is already consistent, avoid:

    • switching between major citation styles, e.g. parenthetical and <ref> tags, or replacing the preferred style of one academic discipline with another's;
    • adding citation templates to an article that already uses a consistent system without templates, or removing citation templates from an article that uses them consistently;
    • changing where the references are defined, e.g. moving reference definitions in the reflist to the prose, or moving reference definitions from the prose into the reflist.

    The following are standard practice:

    • improving existing citations by adding missing information, such as by replacing bare URLs with full bibliographic citations: an improvement because it aids verifiability, and fights linkrot;
    • replacing some or all general references with inline citations: an improvement because it provides more verifiable information to the reader, and helps maintain text–source integrity;
    • imposing one style on an article with inconsistent citation styles (e.g., some of the citations in footnotes and others as parenthetical references): an improvement because it makes the citations easier to understand and edit;
    • fixing errors in citation coding, including incorrectly used template parameters, and markup problems: an improvement because it helps the citations to be parsed correctly;
    • combining duplicate citations (see § Duplicate citations, above).

    Handling links in citations

    As noted above under What information to include, it is helpful to include hyperlinks to source material, when available. Here we note some issues concerning these links.

    Avoid embedded links

    Embedded links to external websites should not be used as a form of inline citation, because they are highly susceptible to linkrot. Wikipedia allowed this in its early years—for example by adding a link after a sentence, like this [http://media.guardian.co.uk/site/story/0,14173,1601858,00.html], which looks like this. [1]

    Leave a Comment

    (0 Comments)

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *